Reducing the impacts of food crises: how can we act earlier and better?

20-year-old Fatuma Mohamed and husband Abdulahi Osman (25) with their two boys - Yusuf, who is only three-and-a-half weeks old, and Mohamed (2½). Photographer: Peter Caton
20-year-old Fatuma Mohamed and husband Abdulahi Osman (25) with their two boys - Yusuf, who is only three-and-a-half weeks old, and Mohamed (2½). Photographer: Peter Caton

As the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, Sir Mark Lowcock, recently said (and not for the first time), in general, “the humanitarian financing system is still designed to wait for disasters to strike before mobilizing resources”.

We know that responding before a crisis takes hold can prevent it escalating into a disaster, save lives and prevent suffering, reduce the need for a costlier humanitarian response and protect the development gains of communities. Despite this recognition, there’s still some way to go to making early action standard.

When it comes slow-onset food crises, the issue is rarely lack of early warning or ‘not knowing’ they are happening. Early warning systems are not new. And there have been a number of pushes to ensure that early warning leads to early action. There are several, admittedly imperfect, mechanisms including the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) System most commonly used by OCHA. The challenge is turning warning into action and overcoming the well-documented systemic obstacles to early response, such as bureaucratic inertia, risk aversion, lack of political will and lack of capacity at national level.

Effective early action is not just about a fast humanitarian response. The response needs to better meet the needs of crisis-affected people. Those needs can vary significantly depending upon the context. They are also best known by the people themselves. How then can early action be community-centred and at the same time happen at a large scale? Concern Worldwide commissioned some research – looking at literature and practice – to contribute to the debate around this question. Specifically, how can the dissemination of early warning information support communities to drive their own early action, and how can the perspectives and priorities identified by crisis-affected people be fed into, and inform wider early warning-early action structures operating at a larger scale.

Here’s what we found:

  1. Community-centred EWEA systems in all contexts require a long-term approach; in terms of vision, planning and funding. EWEA systems are vulnerable when dependent on short-term donor funding. For early warning information to be seen as credible and useful by local communities, it needs continuity and reliability. This can be difficult to achieve through a short-term projectised approach.
  2. EWEA systems should be embedded in a national system to ensure long-term, sustainable impact at scale. This can take years (even decades) of commitment and collaboration.
  3. Embedding in a national system is not always possible, particularly in fragile and weak states. Where government may have very limited resources and/or little interest in supporting community-centred EWEA it may be more effective to promote community-centred EWEA through civil society organisations.
  4. The climate information community have made most progress in ensuring a two-way flow of early warning information from community to national level (and vice versa). This often involves collective interpretation of climate information by communities, sectoral actors, and climate information providers. To be useful, early warning information has to be granular enough to meet the needs of a range of different people, dependent on a number of different livelihoods.
  5. Early action means identifying and responding to the ‘livelihood crisis’ – when people are forced to abandon their normal practices to cope in the short term – rather than to the ‘humanitarian emergency’ – when these coping strategies are no longer enough. Early action needs to start with the community’s perception of threats, priorities and needs. Assumptions should not be made about what the hazards are that communities face, and what the best response will be. All of this requires long-term engagement, and links to be built between community-level disaster risk reduction plans and the early response.

 

As the practicalities of the newly-announced World Bank and UN Famine Action Mechanisms are developed, it’ll be important to make sure the lessons from past early warning-early action systems are put into practice. At Concern Worldwide, we’ll be continuing to work on some of the questions, challenges and implications from this research over the coming months.

Sally Tyldesley 

Senior Policy Officer, Resilience

Help those in need across the world

  • Our mission is to permanently transform the lives of people living in extreme poverty.

  • When an emergency strikes we are among the first on the ground.

  • We go to the ends of earth to deliver aid where it's needed most.

Donate now
Share your concern